| Welcome |
|
pre·mo·ni·tion n |
1. A presentiment of the future; a foreboding.
2. A warning in advance; a forewarning. |
Premonition is a short film with three main characters.
It is a contemporary story set in Geneva, about man who has a recurring
nightmare and the way he reacts to it.
The film is based on the question about whether we can sometimes see the
future. There is an interesting
international project described in this
Red Nova article
that presents some rather remarkable results on the subject.
This film contains a plot twist at the end which the viewer should not know
in advance to fully appreciate the film. If you do not want to participate
in the production but would like to have a chance to enjoy the film when it is
released, then we suggest that you do not read any further on this page as it
contains spoilers. |
| Development team |
| Producer |
Markus Brugger |
|
Writer/Director |
Quentin King |
|
| Script |
The first release of the draft script (V1.6) is available in three formats
The names used in the draft script are provisional and will be chosen
depending upon the nationalities of the actors. The ScriptMaker tool makes
it simple to change the names at any time.
Many thanks for feedback on the script.
All comments/improvements gratefully received.
|
| Synopsis |
We witness a nightmare in which we sees a cloaked woman being murdered in a deserted
city street by an knife wielding attacker, just after midnight on Friday 13th. We never see the
woman's face because it is hidden in the shadows of her hood. The dreamer, a man
in his thirties, awakes alone in his bed. It's 3am. He uses his
computer to book a flight for a woman from London to Geneva for
later that day, Thursday 12th. The man enters his office with a sandwich,
it's early afternoon. He is a scientist working at CERN. He uses his
computer to look up "Premonition" on Google. A secretary approaches his
door and checks her appearance before entering. She is wearing a small
silver cross on a chain around her neck. She tells the scientist that a
woman left a phone message while he was at lunch. The woman is delayed
two hours and sounded angry.
Later in the afternoon, the scientist visits the secretary in her office and
they talk about premonitions. They are both shy in each other's company.
She asks if he'd like to meet after work to talk further, but they
are interrupted by his mobile phone ringing and he leaves without answering her question.
Later, a woman enters his office pulling a small travel bag on wheels.
She is his sister and she is worried and wants to know why she has been summoned
to Geneva. He delays telling her until they have taken the bus into town and
have entered his apartment.
He starts with the story (learned from his web research) of David
Booth who in 1979 had a recurring dream about a plane crash. He notified the FAA
and American Airlines and on May 25 his dream came true when Flight 191 crashed
on takeoff from O’Hare. The sister is sceptical and asks the point of the story.
He tells that for the first time in his life and every night for a week he has
had exactly the same nightmare in which he fails to stop her being murdered at
midnight on Friday 13th.
She is unimpressed and angry to have come to Geneva just for a dream and
prepares to leave immediately. He begs her to stay and reluctantly she
agrees. They spend the evening in the apartment. She asks what is going on between him and the secretary. He says
nothing and is intrigued to learn that the sister had the impression that the
secretary is interested in him.
They pass the evening eating takeaway food, drinking wine and playing chess. As midnight approaches, he becomes
nervous and at midnight she fakes being attacked. He is completely shocked
and distressed. She finds it funny and then goes to bed, reminding him
that in London it isn’t midnight yet. He waits until 1am to check that
nothing happens before also going to bed.
The next morning they take the bus to the airport where they part on good
terms.
Later in the morning he approaches the secretary's office looking happy, only
to find the door is locked. He asks a passing colleague if she has been
seen but she hasn't. In a flash back he hears again her question if he
would like to meet her after work and then sees again the very end of the
nightmare. This time we see just a little more of the murdered woman,
enough to see that she was wearing a small silver cross on a chain. He is
overcome with grief and shock as the belief that he saved the wrong woman
settles on him. |
Character
personalities |
| Brother |
The principle character is a physicist working for CERN in Geneva.
He is 30-40, shy and introverted, intelligent and passionate about his work. He is agnostic and applies the
scientific method in all areas of his life. He is open to ideas but only believes in things which have clear evidence to support
them. His personality type is
INTP. |
|
Sister |
The principle character's sister works in London and is confident
and extrovert. She is intelligent, direct, strongly atheist and
sceptical about anything which isn't accepted fact. They are close
in age (could even be twins). Her personality type is
ENTJ. |
|
Secretary |
The secretary working in the same group as the physicist is 20-30
and also shy and introverted. She is slightly in awe of the
academic intelligence of her scientific colleagues. She would
describe herself as Christian, though she doesn't attend church
regularly. She believes in God, without being able to define Him
very clearly, but believes that everything happens for a good reason.
Her personality type is
ISFP |
|
| Tension |
Premonition has three points of tension:

The first aims to gain the viewer's attention by being both shocking and
intriguing. The second builds and then explodes the expectation built by
the first, and acts as a phony ending. While the true ending aims to be
surprising and yet sufficiently ambiguous that the question of whether the
premonition was true or not remains open. |
Sub-plots and
back story |
The draft script includes a number of sub-plots and back story elements with the aim to add
depth to the characters, making them more interesting and their actions more
believable. Each of these increase the running time and
complexity of the film and could be left out with more or less influence on the
resulting film. Every one needs to be examined to see if it adds enough
value to the film to justify it's inclusion.
| Ketchup blood |
The sister fakes being attacked and simulates blood
using a ketchup packet that she find in the kitchen. We can see her
playing with it during the kitchen scene. The use of this prop
implies a significant degree of forward planning by the sister. |
| David Booth's story |
The brother tells the true story about David
Booth's premonition in 1979. This allows the sister to reveal her
strongly skeptical personality as well as being interesting. |
| The dead mother |
The brother's mother was killed when he and
his sister where young teenagers. There was no father on the scene
by that time. The brother still has a strong sense of guilt that he failed to
prevent it, which is behind his reaction to invite his sister to Geneva
following the nightmares. |
| The potential love
story |
The secretary has developed a crush on the brother. He hasn't noticed because both he and she are very
introverted and reserved. This is the motivation for her to invite
him to meet after work, and is why he wants to see her the following
morning. The sister reveals the secretary's feelings to her
brother in the kitchen scene. |
| The time change |
After faking being attacked, the sister mentions that
it's not yet midnight in London. The brother then stays up for
another hour to check that she is alright. This demonstrates the
depth of the brother's concern for the sister, and the extent to which
he believes his own premonition. |
Twins
(not included) |
The brother and sister are twins.
This would imply a closer and potentially paranormal bond
between them. It is hard to see how to include this information in
the dialogue. |
Happy ending
(excluded since V1.2) |
The secretary appears behind the principle character
just as he believes that she was the subject of his dream. He
embraces her out of relief and we see her expression change from surprise to delight. This completely changes the nature of the film,
becoming a love story instead of a suspense drama. If it was
really wanted, it could be a teaser at the start of the film, before the
nightmare. |
|
| Production diary |
| 2/1/2005 |
QK |
Woke up with the basic idea for Premonition. |
| 2/1/2005 |
QK |
Saw The Incredibles with
Denise, Alastair, Fanen, Mike and Johanna. During dinner at an Asian restaurant
afterwards I discussed the synopsis with Alastair. |
| 4/1/2005 |
QK |
Told synopsis to with Erik after squash – he proposed the name
“Premonition”. Included "happy ending" in which the
secretary appears at the end and she and the brother embrace. He
agreed to provide write/perform the music and to do the sound for the
film. |
| 6/1/2005 |
QK |
Found
ScriptMaker tool. Wrote first version of the synopsis. |
| 7/1/2005 |
QK |
Long Skype discussion with Hugh.
His message was: "Keep it simple and true to it’s idea. Cut
the happy ending, cut everything which doesn't drive the narrative
forward. Don't expect to give characters depth in a short film." |
| 8/1/2005 |
QK |
Helped Silvia move apartment – Saw Oliver Stone's Alexander
in the evening (way too long) with Karsten, Markus, Micha and Anna.
Told them the synopsis. Conclusion: drop the happing ending -
done! |
| 9/1/2005 |
QK |
Dinner with Markus – Discussed his film idea, Expectations, and
Premonition. Agreed on the name for the group “Open Your Eyes
Films”. |
| 12/1/2005 |
QK |
Spend 1 hour writing script with new tool. |
| 14/1/2005 |
QK |
Discussed synopsis with Silvia – she liked the idea is
interested to help with locations, sets and costumes. |
| 15/1/2005 |
QK |
Spent 3 hours writing dialog – found interesting advice on
http://screenwriting.info.
Wrote
first living room scene. Included the story of David Booth in the first
draft. We'll see how long it is later and what to cut. |
| 16/1/2005 |
QK |
Discussed script with Erik. He proposed to move the bus ride to
the morning after to keep the tension between brother and sister from
office to home. Good idea that I’ve already implemented, though I
propose to keep one very short shot of them on the bus going home,
looking stressed. |
| 18/1/2005 |
QK |
Spent 1 hour writing dialog for the kitchen scene about secretary. |
| 19/1/2005 |
QK |
Spent 3 hours finishing the rest of the scenes. First rough draft
completed (V1.4). 12 pages + cover page. Probably about 20
minutes in its initial form. |
| 20/1/2005 |
QK |
Spent 2 hours checking spelling, grammar and layout. Clean
first draft (V1.5) completed and converted to PDF. |
| 21/1/2005 |
QK |
Created this website. Markus agreed to be producer for the
project. |
| 22/1/2005 |
QK |
Comments on V1.5 from Erik and Markus:
- Sister's faked attack isn't believable - no one could be that
mean - Erik
- Sister's faked attack is completely believable - I know someone
who has done worse! - Markus
- If we want a happy ending, it should be at the beginning as a
teaser before the nightmare scene.
- The film shouldn't start too fast - there could be a tour of the
brother's apartment before the nightmare scene.
- The brother keeps a journal which shows us that he has had the
nightmare every night for a week.
- The sister drinks more wine than the brother so that her faked
attack is partly the result of her being a bit drunk.
|
| 23/1/2005 |
QK |
Prepared V1.6 for publication on this page incorporating most of the
comments. |
| 25/1/2005 |
MB |
Email notification sent about EYO/Birthday party in February. |
| 26/1/2005 |
QK |
Feedback received from
Tom Payne and Toni Oettl |
| 4/1/2005 |
QK |
Feedback received from
Kat Tiefenthal |
| 10/2/2005 |
QK |
New feedback and comments added to the feedback page. |
|